Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Federico Cina vs Ignacio Buse Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Cina vs Buse analysis and find out who is favored!
Federico Cina vs Ignacio Buse Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Cina 0 - 0 Buse
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Cina has won 49.09% of points on their second serve, while Buse has won 47.28%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Cina, in recent form, has won 51.08% of their opponent's second serve points, while Buse has won 55.56%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.03% and 39.53% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Cina has saved 60.4% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Buse has saved 58.18% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Cina has won 42.31% of matches played (W/L 11/ 15), with Buse winning 67.12% (W/L 49/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Cina has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 10/ 10), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 20% (W/L 2/ 8). Buse has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 14/ 8), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 63/ 42).
- Player level: In the last year, Cina has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 55% of matches (W/L 11/ 9), where as Buse has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.97% of matches (W/L 23/ 16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Cina has played against opponents with an average rank of 195.15 while Buse has played against players with an average rank of 220.22.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Cina has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Buse has won 60% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Cina has converted 39.73% of breakpoint opportunities, and Buse has converted 49.86% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
N/A
Rank
High
17
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
315
Rank
315
High
20
Age
Plays
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
Form
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
40% (12-18)
Career Total W/L
61% (77-50)
42% (10-14)
YTD W/L
64% (27-15)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Federico Cina vs Ignacio Buse For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Cina VS Buse
Sportsbook
Offer
No H2H Matches Available
Federico Cina Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats 
Thiago Agustin Tirante
Player
Federico Cina
62%
(
47 of
76)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
66)
7
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
0
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
30 of
36)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
30%
(
23 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
19 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luciano Darderi
Player
Federico Cina
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
7
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
10 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R3 | 7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Kai Wehnelt
Player
Federico Cina
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
20 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
20 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Cina
Player
Matic Kriznik
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
68)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Cristian Jianu
Player
Federico Cina
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
43 of
72)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bu Yunchaokete
Player
Federico Cina
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
43%
(
22 of
51)
11
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Ignacio Buse Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Enrico Dalla Valle
Player
Ignacio Buse
67%
(
56 of
83)
1st Serve %
59%
(
64 of
109)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
34 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
51 of
109)
100
Total Points Won
92
|
6-4 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ignacio Buse
Player
Riccardo Bonadio
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve %
70%
(
35 of
50)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ignacio Buse
Player
Alexey Zakharov
74%
(
53 of
72)
1st Serve %
47%
(
37 of
79)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
8
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
79)
83
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(11) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Ignacio Buse
55%
(
47 of
86)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
83)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
35%
(
30 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
83)
89
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ignacio Buse
Player
Jiri Vesely
53%
(
38 of
72)
1st Serve %
54%
(
31 of
57)
9
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
7
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
29 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Lorenzo Giustino
Player
Ignacio Buse
84%
(
71 of
85)
1st Serve %
81%
(
46 of
57)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
44%
(
37 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
79
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(4) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ignacio Buse
Player
Pol Martin Tiffon
82%
(
82 of
100)
1st Serve %
58%
(
57 of
98)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
52%
(
43 of
82)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
47%
(
47 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
41 of
98)
94
Total Points Won
104
|
6-4 2-6 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ignacio Buse
Player
Max Alcala Gurri
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve %
54%
(
25 of
46)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
13 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ignacio Buse
Player
Albert Pedrico Kravtsov
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
71%
(
39 of
55)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Ignacio Buse
Player
Albert Pedrico Kravtsov
54%
(
36 of
67)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Cina Vs Buse Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Cina are available here and Buse photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
